Skip to content
TEN Brief Ten verified stories a day 2026.09.05 KO

이 기사는 한국어로도 읽을 수 있습니다 →

Tech · 4 min read · Breaking

US chip tariffs and the Korea talks, September 4, 2026 — "if you don't build here, expect to pay"

The semiconductor tariff the United States is preparing is being designed as a condition rather than a rate. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on September 2 that companies building production facilities in the United States would see tariffs waived or reduced, and that those which do not should expect to pay for access to the world's largest market. No rate has been published. On September 4 a South Korean presidential office official told reporters that semiconductors are part of the investment discussions with Washington and that both sides are working to keep the various disputes from obstructing one another. Under last year's framework Korea committed 350 billion dollars of US manufacturing investment in return for chip tariff treatment no less favourable than competitors with equal or larger chip trade volumes. Samsung is building a foundry in Taylor, Texas for at least 17 billion dollars and SK hynix has broken ground on HBM packaging in Lafayette, Indiana — but neither has front-end memory fabrication on US soil

A factory steel frame rising on a clear morning, cranes and stacked materials on open ground

The three lines

  • Design — not a rate but a condition: build in the US for relief, or pay to enter
  • Pressure point — Samsung and SK hynix have US foundry and packaging, no memory front end
  • Korea's card — a 350bn dollar investment pledge tied to 'no less favourable' tariff treatment

Key questions

What is the US semiconductor tariff rate?
**There isn't one yet.** What has been disclosed is the **design**, not the number. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a September 2 broadcast interview that the administration is preparing a "targeted, thoughtful tariff policy" on semiconductors, and stated the core condition plainly: **if you do not build here, expect to pay to enter the greatest market in the world.** Inverted, that means **companies building US production capacity get tariffs waived or reduced.** Under this structure the operative variable is not the rate but **who qualifies for relief.** TSMC and Micron, both building major US fabs, sit on the relief side. The scope is also being widened: alongside chips themselves, the administration has considered covering **finished goods that contain chips — data centre servers and laptops** — and an August 27 report described removing the existing data centre exemption (see "US weighs a second round of semiconductor tariffs, August 27, 2026"). How far that scope lands decides whether this touches chipmakers only or server builders and data centre operators too.
Don't Samsung and SK hynix already have US plants?
**They do — but not the kind this tariff is aimed at.** Samsung Electronics is building an advanced **foundry** (contract manufacturing) plant in Taylor, Texas for at least 17 billion dollars. SK hynix broke ground late last month on an **HBM packaging** facility in Lafayette, Indiana. But both companies' core business is **front-end memory fabrication** — producing DRAM and NAND on wafers — and those fabs are still overwhelmingly in Korea. A foundry manufactures other companies' designs; packaging stacks and encases chips that already exist. **The gap is exactly what Washington is pressing on**: front-end memory fabs on US soil, a decision measured in tens of billions of dollars rather than a line addition. One more piece of context sits underneath: **China's CXMT was reported to have taken 10 percent of global DRAM share in the second quarter of 2026.** US containment of China and US pressure on Korean firms are moving on the same board.
Didn't Korea already agree something on this?
**Yes, and the agreement contains a tariff clause.** Korea committed **350 billion dollars of US manufacturing investment**, and in exchange Korean chipmakers are to receive tariff rates **no less favourable** than competitors with equal or larger semiconductor trade volumes. Read the clause precisely: it does not say *no tariff*. It says **not treated worse than Taiwan or Japan.** If Washington taxes everyone, Korea pays too — it simply does not fall behind. The September 4 remarks sit in that frame. The presidential office official said there are "various issues between South Korea and the United States, and they are sometimes affecting each other," noting that semiconductors are in the investment discussions and that both sides are **making efforts to prevent them from hindering each other**. In the same briefing the official said talks on Korea's nuclear-powered submarine plan **had not progressed**. Chips and submarines appearing in one briefing is the point: **several files are tied to one table**, and under that structure the chip terms can move on the outcome of something that is not about chips.

The shape of the US semiconductor tariff came into view in the first week of September. The unusual part is that there is still no rate. What has been disclosed is a condition, not a number.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a September 2 broadcast interview that the administration is preparing a "targeted, thoughtful tariff policy" on semiconductors. He put the core term in one sentence:

If you don't build here, expect to pay to enter the greatest market in the world.

Inverted: companies that do build US production capacity get the tariff waived or reduced.

1. It is a list, not a rate

Under this design the decisive variable is not the percentage but who ends up on the relief side.

TSMC and Micron, both building at scale in the United States, qualify. TSMC has said it is constructing 20 fabs simultaneously worldwide and still cannot keep up with AI demand.

The scope is also under expansion. Alongside chips themselves, the administration has weighed covering finished goods containing chips — data centre servers and laptops — and an August 27 report described eliminating the existing data centre exemption (see "US weighs a second round of semiconductor tariffs, August 27, 2026"). Where that boundary settles determines whether this lands on chipmakers alone, or reaches server and PC builders and then the data centre operators behind them.

2. The empty column at Samsung and SK hynix

It is not that the Korean firms are building nothing in the United States. It is what kind of thing they are building.

CompanyUS facilityProcess stageRelation to core business
Samsung ElectronicsTaylor, Texas — at least $17bnFoundry (contract fab)Not memory
SK hynixLafayette, Indiana — broke ground last monthHBM packagingBack end
BothNo front-end memory fabCore capacity is in Korea

A foundry manufactures other companies' designs. Packaging stacks and encases chips that already exist. Both companies' actual core is front-end memory fabrication — building DRAM and NAND on wafers — and that capacity remains overwhelmingly in Korea.

That empty column is precisely the target. And placing a front-end memory fab in the United States is a decision measured in tens of billions of dollars, categorically different from adding one foundry building or one packaging line.

One more piece sits underneath. China's CXMT was reported to have taken 10 percent of global DRAM share in the second quarter of 2026. When Samsung and SK hynix each fell more than 4 percent on September 2, Chinese HBM3E production news was among the drivers (see "Samsung Electronics and SK hynix fall 4% on September 2, 2026"). US containment of China and US pressure on Korean firms move on the same board.

3. The clause Korea is holding

Korea has a written basis already. Under last year's framework it committed 350 billion dollars of US manufacturing investment, and in exchange Korean chipmakers are to receive tariff rates no less favourable than competitors with equal or larger semiconductor trade volumes.

Read the clause carefully. It does not say "no tariff." It says "not treated worse than Taiwan or Japan." If Washington taxes everyone, Korea pays too — it just does not fall behind.

The September 4 remarks belong to that frame. The presidential office official said there are "various issues between South Korea and the United States, and they are sometimes affecting each other," adding that semiconductors are included in the investment discussions and that both governments are making efforts to prevent them from hindering each other.

Another sentence in the same briefing shows the structure: talks on Korea's plan to build nuclear-powered submarines had not progressed. Chips and submarines surfacing in one briefing is the point — several files sit on one table, and in that arrangement the chip terms can move on an outcome that has nothing to do with chips.

4. What is still open

  • There is no rate. Effective date, product classification (how far "contains a chip" reaches), and exemption criteria are all unpublished. Only the design direction is settled.
  • The "no less favourable" wording needs reading. Reports carry the substance, not the text. How the comparison set is defined and who adjudicates it determine whether the clause bites.
  • The presidential office remarks are an unattributed briefing. Full text and context have not been released.
  • The market is already trading this. On September 4, Samsung closed 2.20 percent higher at 255,500 won and SK hynix 3.20 percent higher at 1,647,000 won (see "KOSPI closes at 6,687.21 on September 4, 2026"). On August 28, foreign investors sold a net 1.7 trillion won on chip tariff news. The same file has been read as bullish and bearish within a week — which is what it looks like when nobody knows the answer yet.

Sources

  1. Reuters/Yahoo Finance — South Korea says chip investments under discussion with US amid tariff concerns
  2. Seoul Economic Daily (English) — U.S. Signals Chip Tariffs, Offers Relief for Plants Built at Home
  3. Financial News — Lutnick signals targeted chip tariffs, pressing Samsung and SK hynix for more US investment
  4. Hankyung — Lutnick warns of consequences for chipmakers that do not build in the US
  5. Edaily — Lutnick previews targeted tariffs on semiconductors
  6. CNBC — U.S. considers fresh round of tariffs on semiconductors, report says

Verification

Published
Last modified
Cross-check
Checked against 6 independent sources.
Unverified
  • No tariff rate has been announced. Effective date, product classification, and the criteria for exemption are all unpublished.
  • The exact wording and implementation procedure of the 'no less favourable' clause must be read in the agreement text; reports summarise only its substance.
  • CXMT's reported 10 percent share of global DRAM in Q2 2026 comes from one outlet citing a tally; the research firm and methodology were not separately verified.
  • The presidential office remarks are from an unattributed briefing. The full text and context have not been published.
Authoring
Reviewed by a person before publication. The full process is described in the Editorial.

Ten stories, once each morning

We send the three-line summaries only; the full pieces stay on the site. One-click unsubscribe, any time.

Related